jay_ross

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision		 Previous revision
jay_ross [2024/06/22 19:45] – created aorchidjay_ross [2024/06/22 20:33] (current) – aorchid
Line 1: Line 1:
-====== Jay Ross Email Attachments ======+====== WLASNC PLUM / Board Motions June 2023 ======
  
 Letters to the City Planning Dept from the WLASNC. No dates on the letters, but discussions appear to have happened in late June 2023.  Letters to the City Planning Dept from the WLASNC. No dates on the letters, but discussions appear to have happened in late June 2023. 
  
 +===== Resolution WLASNC Housing Element 23.6.pdf =====
 +{{ :resolution_wlasnc_housing_element.pdf |}}
  
-===== Resolution WLASNC NodesCorridors 1.2021.pdf =====+The best one.  
 + 
 +1. Provides the list of 500 parcels for redevelopment. (page 7-34.) This creates an additional 13,000 units for 27,000 residents. Most are along commercial corridors, already zoned for high-density and with existing density bonuses.  
 + 
 +2. Notes that the City's first iteration of the Housing Element was not in alignment with the State's HCD handbook and violated the social justice and fair housing criteria.  The City's second Housing Element is pending review based upon locations of the proposed housing.  
 + 
 +3. "Upzoning based on geography may not mitigate past harms from redlining and segregation" 
 + 
 +3. Existing excess capacity can already provide for 20,000 in WLASNC 
 + 
 +4. Chart from page 3 needs to be translated to here.  
 + 
 + 
 +==== Resolution WLASNC ZoningCapacity 4.2022.pdf ==== 
 +{{ :resolution_wlasnc_zoningcapacity_4.2022.pdf |}} 
 + 
 +Request for Dwelling Unit Capacity Calculations 
 + 
 +A request to postpone upzoning until zoning capacity is provided.  
 + 
 +Notes that the area population is about 91,000 in 2020, with existing zoning for a population of 159,000.  
 + 
 +We have excess of 76,000 dwellings with existing zoning.  
 + 
 +Shows that no upzoning is required.  
 + 
 +Contains this link: [[https://westsidecouncils.com/motion/request-for-dwelling-unit-capacity-calculations/ 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +==== Resolution WLASNC WLACommPlan RHNA 23.6.pdf ==== 
 +{{ :resolution_wlasnc_wlacommplan_rhna_23.6.pdf |}} 
 + 
 + 
 +This letter is talking about Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).  
 + 
 +1. Asks that the City show current zoning capacity  
 +2. Show reasonably expected population change 
 +3. Methodology used to allocate RHNA growth number 
 +4. RHNA allocation to each neighborhood.  
 + 
 +==== Resolution WLASNC WLACommPlan Resid LandUse 23.6.pdf ==== 
 +{{ :resolution_wlasnc_wlacommplan_resid_landuse_23.6.pdf |}} 
 + 
 +Opposition to Community PLan Residential re-zoning proposal.  
 + 
 +Our neighborhood is WLA 1-4. States R1 and R2 should stay as is. Increased density should be pushed to transit corridors.  
 + 
 +Bundy, nor is Sawtelle, considered transit corridors.  
 + 
 + 
 + 
 +=== Resolution WLASNC NodesCorridors 1.2021.pdf === 
 +{{ :resolution_wlasnc_nodescorridors_1.2021.pdf |}}
  
 Proposed heights and densities along corridors. With regard to interior neighborhoods, states taht the larger density and heights along the corridors with transit and services shall be balanced with lower densities and heights in interior neighborhoods. This keep building in character and more open space.  Proposed heights and densities along corridors. With regard to interior neighborhoods, states taht the larger density and heights along the corridors with transit and services shall be balanced with lower densities and heights in interior neighborhoods. This keep building in character and more open space. 
Line 10: Line 66:
 Small map included. Not very helpful.  Small map included. Not very helpful. 
  
-==== Resolution WLASNC WLACommPlan Comm 23.6.pdf ====+ 
 +=== Resolution WLASNC WLACommPlan Comm 23.6.pdf === 
 +{{ :resolution_wlasnc_wlacommplan_comm_23.6.pdf |}}
  
 This is talking about revisions to Commercial Zoning.  This is talking about revisions to Commercial Zoning. 
Line 35: Line 93:
  
  
-=== Resolution WLASNC WLACommPlan RHNA 23.6.pdf === 
- 
-This letter is talking about Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA).  
- 
-1. Asks that the City show current zoning capacity  
-2. Show reasonably expected population change 
-3. Methodology used to allocate RHNA growth number 
-4. RHNA allocation to each neighborhood.  
- 
-=== Resolution WLASNC WLACommPlan Resid LandUse 23.6.pdf === 
- 
-Opposition to Community PLan Residential re-zoning proposal.  
- 
-Our neighborhood is WLA 1-4. States R1 and R2 should stay as is. Increased density should be pushed to transit corridors.  
- 
-Bundy, nor is Sawtelle, considered transit corridors.  
  
-=== Resolution WLASNC ZoningCapacity 4.2022.pdf === 
  
  • jay_ross.1719085506.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2024/06/22 19:45
  • by aorchid